English

How to interpret a discovery or null result of the $0\nu 2\beta$ decay

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2015-09-30 v2

Abstract

The Majorana nature of massive neutrinos will be crucially probed in the next-generation experiments of the neutrinoless double-beta (0ν2β0\nu 2\beta) decay. The effective mass term of this process, mee\langle m\rangle^{}_{ee}, may be contaminated by new physics. So how to interpret a discovery or null result of the 0ν2β0\nu 2\beta decay in the foreseeable future is highly nontrivial. In this paper we introduce a novel three-dimensional description of mee|\langle m\rangle_{ee}^{}|, which allows us to see its sensitivity to the lightest neutrino mass and two Majorana phases in a transparent way. We take a look at to what extent the free parameters of mee|\langle m\rangle_{ee}^{}| can be well constrained provided a signal of the 0ν2β0\nu 2\beta decay is observed someday. To fully explore lepton number violation, all the six effective Majorana mass terms mαβ\langle m\rangle_{\alpha\beta}^{} (for α,β=e,μ,τ\alpha, \beta = e, \mu, \tau) are calculated and their lower bounds are illustrated with the two-dimensional contour figures. The effect of possible new physics on the 0ν2β0\nu 2\beta decay is also discussed in a model-independent way. We find that the result of mee|\langle m\rangle_{ee}^{}| in the normal (or inverted) neutrino mass ordering case modified by the new physics effect may somewhat mimic that in the inverted (or normal) mass ordering case in the standard three-flavor scheme. Hence a proper interpretation of a discovery or null result of the 0ν2β0\nu 2\beta decay may demand extra information from some other measurements.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1504.05820,
  title  = {How to interpret a discovery or null result of the $0\nu 2\beta$ decay},
  author = {Zhi-zhong Xing and Zhen-hua Zhao and Ye-Ling Zhou},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1504.05820},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

13 pages, 6 figures, Figures and references updated