How is a graph not like a manifold?
Abstract
For an equivariantly formal action of a compact torus on a smooth manifold with isolated fixed points we investigate the global homological properties of the graded poset of face submanifolds. We prove that the condition of -independency of tangent weights at each fixed point implies -acyclicity of the skeleta for . This result provides a necessary topological condition for a GKM graph to be a GKM graph of some GKM manifold. We use particular acyclicity arguments to describe the equivariant cohomology algebra of an equivariantly formal manifold of dimension with an -independent action of -dimensional torus, under certain colorability assumptions on its GKM graph. This description relates the equivariant cohomology algebra to the face algebra of a simplicial poset. Such observation underlines certain similarity between actions of complexity one and torus manifolds.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2203.10641,
title = {How is a graph not like a manifold?},
author = {Anton Ayzenberg and Mikiya Masuda and Grigory Solomadin},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10641},
year = {2026}
}
Comments
23 pages, 3 figures. In v2 we changed the second part of the paper (on the relation between complexity 1 and 0). To clarify the arguments we sacrificed generality: now in Theorem 2 we require GKM graph to bipartite