Benchmarks are standards that allow to identify opportunities for improvement among comparable units. This study suggests a 2-step methodology for calculating probabilistic benchmarks in noisy data sets: (i) double-hyperbolic undersampling filters the noise of key performance indicators (KPIs), and (ii) a relevance vector machine estimates probabilistic benchmarks with denoised KPIs. The usefulness of the methods is illustrated with an application to a database of nano-finance+. The results indicate that-in the case of nano-finance groups-a higher discrimination power is obtained with variables that capture the macro-economic environment of the country where a group operates. Also, the estimates show that groups operating in rural regions have different probabilistic benchmarks, compared to groups in urban and peri-urban areas.
@article{arxiv.2103.01669,
title = {How good is good? Probabilistic benchmarks and nanofinance+},
author = {Rolando Gonzales Martinez},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.01669},
year = {2021}
}