How (and Why) to Think that the Brain is Literally a Computer
Abstract
The relationship between brains and computers is often taken to be merely metaphorical. However, genuine computational systems can be implemented in virtually any media; thus, one can take seriously the view that brains literally compute. But without empirical criteria for what makes a physical system genuinely a computational one, computation remains a matter of perspective, especially for natural systems (e.g., brains) that were not explicitly designed and engineered to be computers. Considerations from real examples of physical computers-both analog and digital, contemporary and historical-make clear what those empirical criteria must be. Finally, applying those criteria to the brain shows how we can view the brain as a computer (probably an analog one at that), which, in turn, illuminates how that claim is both informative and falsifiable.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2208.12032,
title = {How (and Why) to Think that the Brain is Literally a Computer},
author = {Corey J. Maley},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.12032},
year = {2022}
}