English

How Alfv\'en waves energize the solar wind: heat vs work

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics 2021-05-05 v1 Plasma Physics Space Physics

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that the solar wind is powered to a large extent by an Alfv\'en-wave (AW) energy flux. AWs energize the solar wind via two mechanisms: heating and work. We use high-resolution direct numerical simulations of reflection-driven AW turbulence (RDAWT) in a fast-solar-wind stream emanating from a coronal hole to investigate both mechanisms. In particular, we compute the fraction of the AW power at the coronal base (PAWbP_{\rm AWb}) that is transferred to solar-wind particles via heating between the coronal base and heliocentric distance rr, which we denote χH(r)\chi_{\rm H}(r), and the fraction that is transferred via work, which we denote χW(r)\chi_{\rm W}(r). We find that χW(rA)\chi_{\rm W}(r_{\rm A}) ranges from 0.15 to 0.3, where rAr_{\rm A} is the Alfv\'en critical point. This value is small compared to~one because the Alfv\'en speed vAv_{\rm A} exceeds the outflow velocity UU at r<rAr<r_{\rm A}, so the AWs race through the plasma without doing much work. At r>rAr>r_{\rm A}, where vA<Uv_{\rm A} < U, the AWs are in an approximate sense "stuck to the plasma", which helps them do pressure work as the plasma expands. However, much of the AW power has dissipated by the time the AWs reach r=rAr=r_{\rm A}, so the total rate at which AWs do work on the plasma at r>rAr>r_{\rm A} is a modest fraction of PAWbP_{\rm AWb}. We find that heating is more effective than work at r<rAr<r_{\rm A}, with χH(rA)\chi_{\rm H}(r_{\rm A}) ranging from 0.5 to 0.7. The reason that χH0.5\chi_{\rm H} \geq 0.5 in our simulations is that an appreciable fraction of the local AW power dissipates within each Alfv\'en-speed scale height in RDAWT, and there are a few Alfv\'en-speed scale heights between the coronal base and rAr_{\rm A}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2103.09365,
  title  = {How Alfv\'en waves energize the solar wind: heat vs work},
  author = {Jean C. Perez and Benjamin D. G. Chandran and Kristopher G. Klein and Mihailo M. Martinović},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.09365},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

15 pages, 2 figures, accepted for publication in the Journal of Plasma Physics