English

Honing cross-correlation tools for inference on ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray composition

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2024-04-23 v3 Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

Abstract

The chemical composition of the highest-energy cosmic rays, namely the atomic number ZZ of rays with energies E40 EeVE\gtrsim40~\mathrm{EeV}, remains to date largely unknown. Some information on the composition can be inferred from the deflections that charged ultra-high-energy cosmic rays experience while they traverse intervening magnetic fields. Indeed, such deflections distort and suppress the original anisotropy in the cosmic ray arrival directions; thus, given a source model, a measure of the anisotropy is also a measurement of the deflections, which in turn informs us on the chemical composition. In this work, we show that, by quantifying ultra-high-energy cosmic ray anisotropies through the angular cross-correlation between cosmic rays and galaxies, we would be able to exclude iron fractions fFeO(10%)f_{\rm Fe}\geq{\cal O}(10\%) assuming a fiducial hydrogen map at 2σ2\,\sigma level, and even smaller fractions in the reverse case of hydrogen on an iron map, going well below fH10%f_{\rm H}\approx10\% when we mask the Galactic Centre up to latitudes of 4040^\circ. This is an improvement of a factor of a few compared to our previous method, and is mostly ascribable to a new test statistics which is sensitive to each harmonic multipole individually. Our method can be applied to real data as an independent test of the recent claim that current cosmic-ray data can not be reproduced by any existing model of the Galactic magnetic field, as well as an additional handle to compare any realistic, competing, data-driven composition models.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2310.17699,
  title  = {Honing cross-correlation tools for inference on ultra-high-energy cosmic-ray composition},
  author = {Konstantinos Tanidis and Federico R. Urban and Stefano Camera},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.17699},
  year   = {2024}
}

Comments

9 pages, 3 figures + appendix. Version matching publication at journal