English

Homogenization for non-local elliptic operators in both perforated and non-perforated domains

Analysis of PDEs 2020-01-08 v1

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the homogenization process of the non-local elliptic boundary value problem Lεsuε=((Aε(x)))suε=f\mboxinO,\mathcal{L}_\varepsilon^s u_\varepsilon =(-\nabla\cdot (A_\varepsilon(x)\nabla))^{s}u_\varepsilon=f \mbox{ in } \mathcal O, with 0<s<10<s<1, considering non-homogeneous Dirichlet type condition outside of the bounded domain ORn\mathcal O\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n. We find the homogenized problem by using the HH-convergence method, as ε0\varepsilon\to 0, under standard uniform ellipticity, boundedness and symmetry assumptions on coefficients Aε(x)A_\varepsilon(x), with the homogenized coefficients as the standard HH-limit (cf. \cite{MT1}) of the sequence {Aε}ε>0\{A_\varepsilon\}_{\varepsilon>0}. We also prove that the commonly referred to as \textit{the strange term} in the literature (see \cite[Chapter 4]{MT}) does not appear in the homogenized problem associated with the fractional Laplace operator (Δ)s(-\Delta)^s in a perforated domain. Both of these results have been obtained in the class of general microstructures. Consequently, we could certify that the homogenization process, as ε0\varepsilon\to 0, is stable under s1s\to 1^{-} in the non-perforated domains, but not necessarily in the case of perforated domains.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1805.06264,
  title  = {Homogenization for non-local elliptic operators in both perforated and non-perforated domains},
  author = {Loredana Balilescu and Amrita Ghosh and Tuhin Ghosh},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.06264},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

25 pages, 2 figures