English

Hitting minors on bounded treewidth graphs. I. General upper bounds

Data Structures and Algorithms 2021-03-12 v5 Computational Complexity Combinatorics

Abstract

For a finite collection of graphs F{\cal F}, the F{\cal F}-M-DELETION problem consists in, given a graph GG and an integer kk, deciding whether there exists SV(G)S \subseteq V(G) with Sk|S| \leq k such that GSG \setminus S does not contain any of the graphs in F{\cal F} as a minor. We are interested in the parameterized complexity of F{\cal F}-M-DELETION when the parameter is the treewidth of GG, denoted by twtw. Our objective is to determine, for a fixed F{\cal F}, the smallest function fFf_{{\cal F}} such that {F{\cal F}-M-DELETION can be solved in time fF(tw)nO(1)f_{{\cal F}}(tw) \cdot n^{O(1)} on nn-vertex graphs. We prove that fF(tw)=22O(twlogtw)f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{2^{O(tw \cdot\log tw)}} for every collection F{\cal F}, that fF(tw)=2O(twlogtw)f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{O(tw \cdot\log tw)} if F{\cal F} contains a planar graph, and that fF(tw)=2O(tw)f_{{\cal F}}(tw) = 2^{O(tw)} if in addition the input graph GG is planar or embedded in a surface. We also consider the version of the problem where the graphs in F{\cal F} are forbidden as topological minors, called F{\cal F}-TM-DELETION. We prove similar results for this problem, except that in the last two algorithms, instead of requiring F{\cal F} to contain a planar graph, we need it to contain a subcubic planar graph. This is the first of a series of articles on this topic.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1704.07284,
  title  = {Hitting minors on bounded treewidth graphs. I. General upper bounds},
  author = {Julien Baste and Ignasi Sau and Dimitrios M. Thilikos},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07284},
  year   = {2021}
}

Comments

36 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-22T19:25:58.399Z