English

Hierarchical Gaussian-process test of DESI's dynamical dark-energy preference

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2026-07-26 v1

Abstract

DESI DR2 BAO combined with CMB and Type~Ia supernovae in the Chevallier--Polarski--Linder (CPL) parameterisation prefers evolving dark energy over Λ\LambdaCDM at roughly 2.82.8--4.2σ4.2\sigma. We reconstruct the same late-time expansion history with a hierarchical Gaussian process (GP) that co-samples the kernel hyperparameters (σf,l)(\sigma_f,l) together with (H0,Ωm,Ωk,ωbh2)(H_0, \Omega_m, \Omega_k, \omega_b h^2), coupling BAO, compressed Planck distance priors, and Pantheon+ through a Monte-Carlo effective likelihood conditioned on 37 cosmic-chronometer H(z)H(z) points. The baseline posterior gives w(z0)=0.800.23+0.26w(z\simeq 0)=-0.80^{+0.26}_{-0.23} (68\%~C.L.), about 0.8σ0.8\sigma from w=1w=-1, with l=3.791.12+0.81l=3.79^{+0.81}_{-1.12}. A CPL fit on the identical compressed Planck pipeline improves nested Λ\LambdaCDM by only Δχ21\Delta\chi^2\sim 1 (1σ\sim 1\sigma). Ablations that fix (σf,l)(\sigma_f,l), drop SN or LRG1/2 BAO, replace the radial-basis kernel by Mat\'ern-5/25/2, or tighten the prior on ll leave the median w(0)w(0) within 1σ\lesssim 1\sigma of 1-1. The mild preference reported here is therefore specific to this compressed-CMB analysis and does not address DESI's full Planck-likelihood result.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2607.23593,
  title  = {Hierarchical Gaussian-process test of DESI's dynamical dark-energy preference},
  author = {Yu-Hao Mu and Zhihuan Zhou and Enkun Li},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.23593},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

7 pages, 3 figures