GRB 240825A: Early Reverse Shock and Its Physical Implications
Abstract
Early multiwavelength observations offer crucial insights into the nature of the relativistic jets responsible for gamma-ray bursts and their interaction with the surrounding medium.We present data of GRB 240825A from 17 space- and ground-based telescopes/instruments, covering wavelengths from NIR/optical to X-ray and GeV, and spanning from the prompt emission to the afterglow phase triggered by Swift and Fermi. The early afterglow observations were carried out by SVOM/C-GFT, and spectroscopic observations of the afterglow by GTC, VLT, and TNG determined the redshift of the burst () later.A comprehensive analysis of the prompt emission spectrum observed by Swift-BAT and Fermi-GBM/LAT reveals a rare and significant high-energy cutoff at ~76 MeV. Assuming this cutoff is due to absorption allows us to place an upper limit on the initial Lorentz factor, . The optical/NIR and GeV afterglow light curves be described by the standard external shock model, with early-time emission dominated by a reverse shock (RS) and a subsequent transition to forward shock (FS) emission. Our afterglow modelling yields a consistent estimate of the initial Lorentz factor (). Furthermore, the RS-to-FS magnetic field ratio () indicates that the reverse shock region is significantly more magnetized than the FS region. An isotropic-equivalent kinetic energy of erg is derived, and the corresponding -ray radiation efficiency is estimated to be = 3.1%. On the other hand, the standard afterglow model can not reproduce the X-ray light curve of GRB 240825A, calling for improved models to characterize all multiwavelength data.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2507.02806,
title = {GRB 240825A: Early Reverse Shock and Its Physical Implications},
author = {Chao Wu and Yun Wang and Hua-Li Li and Li-Ping Xin and Dong Xu and Benjamin Schneider and Antonio de Ugarte Postigo and Gavin Lamb and Andrea Reguitti and Andrea Saccardi and Xing Gao and Xing-Ling Li and Qiu-Li Wang and Bing Zhang and Jian-Yan Wei and Shuang-Nan Zhang and Frédéric Daigne and Jean-Luc Atteia and Maria-Grazia Bernardini and Hong-bo Cai and Arnaud Claret and Bertrand Cordier and Jin-Song Deng and Olivier Godet and Diego Götz and Xu-Hui Han and Zhe Kang and Guang-Wei Li and Zhen-Wei Li and Cheng-Zhi Liu and Xiao-Meng Lu and You Lv and Julian P Osborne and Jesse Palmerio and Yu-Lei Qiu and Stéphane Schanne and Damien Turpin and Susanna Diana Vergani and Jing Wang and Yu-Jie Xiao and Wen-Jin Xie and Yang Xu and Zhu-Heng Yao and Pin-Pin Zhang and Ruo-Son Zhang and Cheng-Wei Zhu and Riccardo Brivio and Stefano Covino and Paolo D'Avanzo and Matteo Ferro and Andrea Melandri and Andrea Rossi and José Feliciano Agüí Fernández and Christina C. Thöne and Chun-Hai Bai and Ali Esamdin and Abdusamatjan Iskandar and Shahidin Yaqup and Yu Zhang and Tu-Hong Zhong and Shao-Yu Fu and Shuai-Qing Jiang and Xing Liu and Jie An and Zi-Pei Zhu and Jia-Xin Cao and En-Wei Liang and Da-Bin Lin and Xiang-Gao Wang and Guo-Wang Du and Xin-Zhong Er and Yuan Fang and Xiao-Wei Liu and Christophe Adami and Michel Dennefeld and Emeric Le Floc'h and Johan Peter Uldall Fynbo and Páll Jakobsson and Daniele Bjørn Malesani and Zhi-Ping Jin and Jia Ren and Hao Wang and Da-Ming Wei and Hao Zhou and Sergio Campana and Shiho Kobayashi and Massimiliano De Pasquale},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.02806},
year = {2025}
}
Comments
31 pages, 9 Figures, 10 Tables