Grand Pleromal Transmutation : condensates via Konsishi anomaly, dimensional transmutation and ultraminimal GUTs
Abstract
Using consistency requirements relating chiral condensates imposed by the so called Generalized Konishi Anomaly, we show that dimensional transmutation via gaugino condensation {\emph{in the ultraviolet}} drives gauge symmetry breaking in a large class of {\emph{asymptotically strong}} Super Yang Mills Higgs theories. For Adjoint multiplet type chiral superfields (transforming as representations of a non Abelian gauge group G), solution of the Generalized Konishi Anomaly(GKA) equations allows calculation of quantum corrected VEVs in terms of the dimensional transmutation scale which determines the gaugino condensate. Thus the gauge coupling at the perturbative unification scale generates GUT symmetry breaking VEVs by non-perturbative dimensional transmutation. This obviates the need for large(or any) input mass scales in the superpotential. Rank reduction can be achieved by including pairs of chiral superfields transforming as either or , that form trilinear matrix gauge invariants with . Novel, robust and {\emph{ultraminimal}} Grand unification algorithms emerge from the analysis. We sketch the structure of a realistic Spin(10) model, with the -plet of Spin(10) as the base representation , which mimics the realistic Minimal Supersymmetric GUT but contains even fewer free parameters. We argue that our results point to a large extension of the dominant and normative paradigms of Asymptotic FreedomIR colour confinement and potential driven spontaneous symmetry breaking that have long ruled gauge theories.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2001.05803,
title = {Grand Pleromal Transmutation : condensates via Konsishi anomaly, dimensional transmutation and ultraminimal GUTs},
author = {Charanjit S. Aulakh},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.05803},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
Published version. Section 2.2 (added in v2,v3 to educate reluctant referee) has been removed as redundant because judged obviously known to any competent reader by accepting referee ! Thus v4 is very close to v1 except for correction of a significant typo in eqn(34) section 4.1