GitHub Considered Harmful? Analyzing Open-Source Projects for the Automatic Generation of Cryptographic API Call Sequences
Abstract
GitHub is a popular data repository for code examples. It is being continuously used to train several AI-based tools to automatically generate code. However, the effectiveness of such tools in correctly demonstrating the usage of cryptographic APIs has not been thoroughly assessed. In this paper, we investigate the extent and severity of misuses, specifically caused by incorrect cryptographic API call sequences in GitHub. We also analyze the suitability of GitHub data to train a learning-based model to generate correct cryptographic API call sequences. For this, we manually extracted and analyzed the call sequences from GitHub. Using this data, we augmented an existing learning-based model called DeepAPI to create two security-specific models that generate cryptographic API call sequences for a given natural language (NL) description. Our results indicate that it is imperative to not neglect the misuses in API call sequences while using data sources like GitHub, to train models that generate code.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2211.13498,
title = {GitHub Considered Harmful? Analyzing Open-Source Projects for the Automatic Generation of Cryptographic API Call Sequences},
author = {Catherine Tony and Nicolás E. Díaz Ferreyra and Riccardo Scandariato},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13498},
year = {2022}
}
Comments
Accepted at QRS 2022