English

GHZ versus W : Quantum Teleportation through Noisy Channels

Quantum Physics 2009-11-13 v2

Abstract

Which state does lose less quantum information between GHZ and W states when they are prepared for two-party quantum teleportation through noisy channel? We address this issue by solving analytically a master equation in the Lindbald form with introducing the noisy channels which makes the quantum channels to be mixed states. It is found that the answer of the question is dependent on the type of the noisy channel. If, for example, the noisy channel is (L2,xL_{2,x}, L3,xL_{3,x}, L4,xL_{4,x})-type where LsL's denote the Lindbald operators, GHZ state is always more robust than W state, i.e. GHZ state preserves more quantum information. In, however, (L2,yL_{2,y}, L3,yL_{3,y}, L4,yL_{4,y})-type channel the situation becomes completely reversed. In (L2,zL_{2,z}, L3,zL_{3,z}, L4,zL_{4,z})-type channel W state is more robust than GHZ state when the noisy paramter (κ\kappa) is comparatively small while GHZ state becomes more robust when κ\kappa is large. In isotropic noisy channel we found that both states preserve equal amount of quantum information. A relation between the average fidelity and entanglement for the mixed state quantum channels are discussed.

Cite

@article{arxiv.0801.1433,
  title  = {GHZ versus W : Quantum Teleportation through Noisy Channels},
  author = {Eylee Jung and Mi-Ra Hwang and You Hwan Ju and Min-Soo Kim and Sahng-Kyoon Yoo and Hungsoo Kim and D. K. Park and Jin-Woo Son and S. Tamaryan and Seong-Keuck Cha},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0801.1433},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

19 pages, 7 figure are included, 4 figures are not included due to file size, These 4 figures can be downloaded from http://rose.kyungnam.ac.kr V2: 23 pages, will appear in PRA

R2 v1 2026-06-21T10:01:19.316Z