Ghost Imaging: What is quantum, what is not
Abstract
We provide a unified treatment of classical and quantum Gaussian-state sources that unambiguously identifies which features of ghost imaging are strictly quantum mechanical. We show that ghost-image formation is fundamentally classical, with the image being expressible in terms of the phase-insensitive and phase-sensitive cross correlations between the detected fields. We then consider ghost-imaging scenarios with either phase-insensitive or phase-sensitive sources, where the former are always classical but the latter may be classical or quantum mechanical. We show that if their auto-correlations are identical, then a quantum source provides resolution improvement in its near-field and field-of-view improvement in its far field when compared to a classical source.
Cite
@article{arxiv.quant-ph/0612070,
title = {Ghost Imaging: What is quantum, what is not},
author = {Baris I. Erkmen and Jeffrey H. Shapiro},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:quant-ph/0612070},
year = {2007}
}
Comments
4 pages, 2 figures