English

Geometric phases, gauge symmetries and ray representation

Quantum Physics 2009-11-13 v3 High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract

The conventional formulation of the non-adiabatic (Aharonov-Anandan) phase is based on the equivalence class {eiα(t)ψ(t,x)}\{e^{i\alpha(t)}\psi(t,\vec{x})\} which is not a symmetry of the Schr\"{o}dinger equation. This equivalence class when understood as defining generalized rays in the Hilbert space is not generally consistent with the superposition principle in interference and polarization phenomena. The hidden local gauge symmetry, which arises from the arbitrariness of the choice of coordinates in the functional space, is then proposed as a basic gauge symmetry in the non-adiabatic phase. This re-formulation reproduces all the successful aspects of the non-adiabatic phase in a manner manifestly consistent with the conventional notion of rays and the superposition principle. The hidden local symmetry is thus identified as the natural origin of the gauge symmetry in both of the adiabatic and non-adiabatic phases in the absence of gauge fields, and it allows a unified treatment of all the geometric phases. The non-adiabatic phase may well be regarded as a special case of the adiabatic phase in this re-formulation, contrary to the customary understanding of the adiabatic phase as a special case of the non-adiabatic phase. Some explicit examples of geometric phases are discussed to illustrate this re-formulation.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.quant-ph/0605081,
  title  = {Geometric phases, gauge symmetries and ray representation},
  author = {Kazuo Fujikawa},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:quant-ph/0605081},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

30 pages. Some clarifying sentences have been added in abstract and in the body of the paper. A new additional reference and some typos have been corrected. To appear in Int. J. Mod. Phys. A

R2 v1 2026-07-22T19:54:56.661Z