English

Generators versus projective generators in abelian categories

Representation Theory 2017-10-20 v1

Abstract

Let A\mathcal{A} be an essentially small abelian category. We prove that if A\mathcal{A} admits a generator MM with EndA(M){\rm End}_{\mathcal{A}}(M) right artinian, then A\mathcal{A} admits a projective generator. If A\mathcal{A} is further assumed to be Grothendieck, then this implies that A\mathcal{A} is equivalent to a module category. When A\mathcal{A} is Hom-finite over a field kk, the existence of a generator is the same as the existence of a projective generator, and in case there is such a generator, A\mathcal{A} has to be equivalent to the category of finite dimensional right modules over a finite dimensional kk-algebra. We also show that when A\mathcal{A} is a length category, then there is a one-to-one correspondence between exact abelian extension closed subcategories of A\mathcal{A} and collections of Hom-orthogonal Schur objects in A\mathcal{A}.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1710.07239,
  title  = {Generators versus projective generators in abelian categories},
  author = {Charles Paquette},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.07239},
  year   = {2017}
}

Comments

10 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-22T22:19:37.910Z