English

Generalized R\'enyi Entropy Production Rate in Non-equilibrium Systems: From Markov Processes to Chaotic Dynamics

Statistical Mechanics 2025-10-02 v2 Other Condensed Matter

Abstract

A generalization of the entropy production rate is proposed Πq\Pi_q in non-equilibrium systems by extending the formalism of classical stochastic thermodynamics to regimes with non-Gaussian fluctuations. Through the R\'enyi entropy SqS_q , where entropic parameter qq modulates critical fluctuations, it is defined Πq\Pi_q and the postulated generalized qq-affinity Aq{\cal A}_q for Markov processes, where it is demonstrated that Πq0\Pi_q \geq 0, generalizing the second thermodynamics law.The derived formal framework was applied to the R\"ossler model, a nonlinear dynamical system exhibiting chaos. Numerical simulations show that the entropy production rate Πq\Pi_q can be used as an index of robustness and complexity by quantitatively corroborating the greater robustness of funnel-type chaos compared to spiral-type chaos. Our results reveal limitations of Gibbs-Shannon entropy in capturing non-Gaussian fluctuations induced by nonlinearity. On the contrary, it is found that Πq\Pi_q it can be a suitable magnitude to measure the intensity of chaotic dynamics through the entropy parameter qq , indicating a plausible link with Lyapunov exponents. The proposed formal framework extends the scope of stochastic thermodynamics to complex systems, integrating chaotic dynamics and the role of the entropic index q as a source of irreversibility and in capturing non-Gaussian contributions to entropy production.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2509.01714,
  title  = {Generalized R\'enyi Entropy Production Rate in Non-equilibrium Systems: From Markov Processes to Chaotic Dynamics},
  author = {J. M. Nieto-Villar and R. Mansilla and I. Santamaria-Holek},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.01714},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Inconsistencies have been identified in the text, as pointed out by other authors. After careful consideration, we have concluded that the most responsible course of action is to withdraw the manuscript in its current form