Galaxy bias from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data: combining galaxy density maps and weak lensing maps
Abstract
We measure the redshift evolution of galaxy bias for a magnitude-limited galaxy sample by combining the galaxy density maps and weak lensing shear maps for a 116 deg area of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Science Verification data. This method was first developed in Amara et al. (2012) and later re-examined in a companion paper (Pujol et al. 2016) with rigorous simulation tests and analytical treatment of tomographic measurements. In this work we apply this method to the DES SV data and measure the galaxy bias for a i22.5 galaxy sample. We find the galaxy bias and 1 error bars in 4 photometric redshift bins to be 1.120.19 (z=0.2-0.4), 0.970.15 (z=0.4-0.6), 1.380.39 (z=0.6-0.8)), and 1.450.56 (z=0.8-1.0). These measurements are consistent at the 2 level with measurements on the same dataset using galaxy clustering and cross-correlation of galaxies with CMB lensing, with most of the redshift bins consistent within the 1{\sigma} error bars. In addition, our method provides the only -independent constraint among the three. We forward-model the main observational effects using mock galaxy catalogs by including shape noise, photo-z errors and masking effects. We show that our bias measurement from the data is consistent with that expected from simulations. With the forthcoming full DES data set, we expect this method to provide additional constraints on the galaxy bias measurement from more traditional methods. Furthermore, in the process of our measurement, we build up a 3D mass map that allows further exploration of the dark matter distribution and its relation to galaxy evolution.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.1601.00405,
title = {Galaxy bias from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data: combining galaxy density maps and weak lensing maps},
author = {C. Chang and A. Pujol and E. Gaztanaga and A. Amara and A. Refregier and D. Bacon and M. R. Becker and C. Bonnett and J. Carretero and F. J. Castander and M. Crocce and P. Fosalba and T. Giannantonio and W. Hartley and M. Jarvis and T. Kacprzak and A. J. Ross and E. Sheldon and M. A. Troxel and V. Vikram and J. Zuntz and T. M. C. Abbott and F. B. Abdalla and S. Allam and J. Annis and A. Benoit-Levy and E. Bertin and D. Brooks and E. Buckley-Geer and D. L. Burke and D. Capozzi and A. Carnero Rosell and M. Carrasco Kind and C. E. Cunha and C. B. D'Andrea and L. N. da Costa and S. Desai and H. T. Diehl and J. P. Dietrich and P. Doel and T. F. Eifler and J. Estrada and A. E. Evrard and B. Flaugher and J. Frieman and D. A. Goldstein and D. Gruen and R. A. Gruendl and G. Gutierrez and K. Honscheid and B. Jain and D. J. James and K. Kuehn and N. Kuropatkin and O. Lahav and T. S. Li and M. Lima and J. L. Marshall and P. Martini and P. Melchior and C. J. Miller and R. Miquel and J. J. Mohr and R. C. Nichol and B. Nord and R. Ogando and A. A. Plazas and K. Reil and A. K. Romer and A. Roodman and E. S. Rykoff and E. Sanchez and V. Scarpine and M. Schubnell and I. Sevilla-Noarbe and R. C. Smith and M. Soares-Santos and F. Sobreira and E. Suchyta and M. E. C. Swanson and G. Tarle and D. Thomas and A. R. Walker},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.00405},
year = {2016}
}
Comments
14 pages, 9 figures, 2 table; to be published in MNRAS; update title/affiliation to match journal version