Front- vs. back-illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis
Abstract
Exoplanetary transit and stellar oscillation surveys require a very high precision photometry. The instrumental noise has therefore to be minimized. First, we perform a semi-analytical model of different noise sources. We show that the noise due the CCD electrodes can be overcome using a Gaussian PSF (Point Spread Function) of full width half maximum larger than 1.6 pixels. We also find that for a PSF size of a few pixels, the photometric aperture has to be at least 2.5 times larger than the PSF full width half maximum. Then, we compare a front- with a back-illuminated CCD through a Monte-Carlo simulation. Both cameras give the same results for a PSF full width half maximum larger than 1.5 pixels. All these simulations are applied to the A STEP (Antarctica Search for Transiting Extrasolar Planets) project. As a result, we choose a front-illuminated camera for A STEP because of its better resolution and lower price, and we will use a PSF larger than 1.6 pixels.
Cite
@article{arxiv.0809.4255,
title = {Front- vs. back-illuminated CCD cameras for photometric surveys: a noise budget analysis},
author = {Nicolas Crouzet and Tristan Guillot and Francois Fressin and Alain Blazit},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0809.4255},
year = {2015}
}