English

From Witness-Space Sharpness To Family-Pointwise Exactness For The Solvability Complexity Index

Logic 2026-05-18 v2 Computational Complexity Dynamical Systems Functional Analysis

Abstract

We study how exact Solvability Complexity Index (SCI) statements should be formulated for families of computational problems rather than for single problems. While the equality SCIG(P)=k\mathrm{SCI}_G (\mathcal P)=k is unambiguous for an individual computational problem P\mathcal P, the family setting requires one to distinguish family-pointwise exactness, witness-space sharpness, and worst-case exactness. We formalize this trichotomy, prove that witness-space sharpness coincides with worst-case exactness but is, in general, strictly weaker than family-pointwise exactness, and give a canonical source-family example witnessing the strictness. We then establish two positive upgrade theorems: an abstract pullback principle and a concrete finite-query criterion guaranteeing that witness-space sharpness upgrades to family-pointwise exactness. Next, we introduce a decoder-regular finite-query transport preorder on SCI computational problems, prove that it is a preorder, derive a transport-saturation sufficient criterion extending the principal-source package, and show that the associated transport degrees need not form a lattice in full generality. We analyze the natural decoder classes Rcont\mathscr R_{\mathrm{cont}} and RBor\mathscr R_{\mathrm{Bor}}: on the full class the corresponding quotients are not upper semilattices, while on the nondegenerate subclass the preorder is upward and downward directed. Finally, we exhibit two natural positive families realizing the principal transport mechanism: exact integration on compact intervals and a fixed-window spectral decision family obtained by block-diagonal stabilization.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2604.12750,
  title  = {From Witness-Space Sharpness To Family-Pointwise Exactness For The Solvability Complexity Index},
  author = {Christopher Sorg},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.12750},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Revised version: Replaced Koopman example by mainly self-contained source problem due to modularization; corrected smaller logical mistakes