From Probability to Consilience: How Explanatory Values Implement Bayesian Reasoning
Neurons and Cognition
2020-10-29 v1 Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
Abstract
Recent work in cognitive science has uncovered a diversity of explanatory values, or dimensions along which we judge explanations as better or worse. We propose a Bayesian account of how these values fit together to guide explanation. The resulting taxonomy provides a set of predictors for which explanations people prefer and shows how core values from psychology, statistics, and the philosophy of science emerge from a common mathematical framework. In addition to operationalizing the explanatory virtues associated with, for example, scientific argument-making, this framework also enables us to reinterpret the explanatory vices that drive conspiracy theories, delusions, and extremist ideologies.
Cite
@article{arxiv.2006.02359,
title = {From Probability to Consilience: How Explanatory Values Implement Bayesian Reasoning},
author = {Zachary Wojtowicz and Simon DeDeo},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.02359},
year = {2020}
}
Comments
19 pages, 1 figure, comments welcome