English

Flavor dependence of annihilation parameters in QCD factorization

High Energy Physics - Phenomenology 2013-08-14 v2 High Energy Physics - Experiment

Abstract

For Bd,sπK±B_{d,s} \to \pi^\mp K^\pm and K()K()K^{(\ast)} K^{(\ast)} decays, the flavor symmetry breaking effects may be particularly small since the final state interactions should be the same between the corresponding BdB_d and BsB_s decays due to the charge conjugation symmetry of the final states. This is consistent with the newly measured direct CP asymmetry of Bsπ+KB_s \to \pi^+ K^-. These decays are thus supposed to be important in testing the Standard Model and in probing new physics effects. However, the observation of pure annihilation decay Bsπ+πB_s \to \pi^+ \pi^- appears to imply a large annihilation scenario with ρA3\rho_A \sim 3, in contrast to the case of ρA1\rho_A \sim 1 in Bu,dB_{u,d} decays in the framework of QCD factorization. This seems to indicate unexpectedly large flavor symmetry breaking effects between the annihilation amplitudes of BsB_s and Bu,dB_{u,d} decays. This apparent contradiction could be resolved by noticing that there is a priori no reason to justify the common practice of assuming the universality of annihilation parameters for different Dirac structures of effective operators. We then argue that, for Bd,sπK±B_{d,s} \to \pi^\mp K^\pm decays, the flavor symmetry breaking effects of annihilation amplitudes have all been included in the initial state decay constants and are thus small. But the flavor symmetry breaking effects in Bd,sK()K()B_{d,s} \to K^{(\ast)} K^{(\ast)} decays are likely to be much larger, as part of the annihilation topologies of BsKKB_s \to K K decay could be related to Bsπ+πB_s \to \pi^+ \pi^- decay. Therefore when new physics effects are searched for in these decay channels, care must be taken to consider the potentially large flavor symmetry breaking effects in more details.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1304.7438,
  title  = {Flavor dependence of annihilation parameters in QCD factorization},
  author = {Kai Wang and Guohuai Zhu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.7438},
  year   = {2013}
}

Comments

17 pages, 5 figures, published in Phys. Rev. D

R2 v1 2026-06-22T00:07:34.405Z