English

Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacy

Cryptography and Security 2018-10-25 v3

Abstract

We show new lower bounds on the sample complexity of (ε,δ)(\varepsilon, \delta)-differentially private algorithms that accurately answer large sets of counting queries. A counting query on a database D({0,1}d)nD \in (\{0,1\}^d)^n has the form "What fraction of the individual records in the database satisfy the property qq?" We show that in order to answer an arbitrary set Q\mathcal{Q} of nd\gg nd counting queries on DD to within error ±α\pm \alpha it is necessary that nΩ~(dlogQα2ε). n \geq \tilde{\Omega}\Bigg(\frac{\sqrt{d} \log |\mathcal{Q}|}{\alpha^2 \varepsilon} \Bigg). This bound is optimal up to poly-logarithmic factors, as demonstrated by the Private Multiplicative Weights algorithm (Hardt and Rothblum, FOCS'10). In particular, our lower bound is the first to show that the sample complexity required for accuracy and (ε,δ)(\varepsilon, \delta)-differential privacy is asymptotically larger than what is required merely for accuracy, which is O(logQ/α2)O(\log |\mathcal{Q}| / \alpha^2). In addition, we show that our lower bound holds for the specific case of kk-way marginal queries (where Q=2k(dk)|\mathcal{Q}| = 2^k \binom{d}{k}) when α\alpha is not too small compared to dd (e.g. when α\alpha is any fixed constant). Our results rely on the existence of short \emph{fingerprinting codes} (Boneh and Shaw, CRYPTO'95, Tardos, STOC'03), which we show are closely connected to the sample complexity of differentially private data release. We also give a new method for combining certain types of sample complexity lower bounds into stronger lower bounds.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1311.3158,
  title  = {Fingerprinting Codes and the Price of Approximate Differential Privacy},
  author = {Mark Bun and Jonathan Ullman and Salil Vadhan},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.3158},
  year   = {2018}
}

Comments

Full version of our STOC 2014 paper. To appear in SIAM Journal on Computing