English

Finer-grained Reductions in Fine-grained Hardness of Approximation

Data Structures and Algorithms 2023-11-03 v1 Computational Complexity Computational Geometry

Abstract

We investigate the relation between δ\delta and ϵ\epsilon required for obtaining a (1+δ)(1+\delta)-approximation in time N2ϵN^{2-\epsilon} for closest pair problems under various distance metrics, and for other related problems in fine-grained complexity. Specifically, our main result shows that if it is impossible to (exactly) solve the (bichromatic) inner product (IP) problem for vectors of dimension clogNc \log N in time N2ϵN^{2-\epsilon}, then there is no (1+δ)(1+\delta)-approximation algorithm for (bichromatic) Euclidean Closest Pair running in time N22ϵN^{2-2\epsilon}, where δ(ϵ/c)2\delta \approx (\epsilon/c)^2 (where \approx hides \polylog\polylog factors). This improves on the prior result due to Chen and Williams (SODA 2019) which gave a smaller polynomial dependence of δ\delta on ϵ\epsilon, on the order of δ(ϵ/c)6\delta \approx (\epsilon/c)^6. Our result implies in turn that no (1+δ)(1+\delta)-approximation algorithm exists for Euclidean closest pair for δϵ4\delta \approx \epsilon^4, unless an algorithmic improvement for IP is obtained. This in turn is very close to the approximation guarantee of δϵ3\delta \approx \epsilon^3 for Euclidean closest pair, given by the best known algorithm of Almam, Chan, and Williams (FOCS 2016). By known reductions, a similar result follows for a host of other related problems in fine-grained hardness of approximation. Our reduction combines the hardness of approximation framework of Chen and Williams, together with an MA communication protocol for IP over a small alphabet, that is inspired by the MA protocol of Chen (Theory of Computing, 2020).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2311.00798,
  title  = {Finer-grained Reductions in Fine-grained Hardness of Approximation},
  author = {Elie Abboud and Noga Ron-Zewi},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00798},
  year   = {2023}
}