Modern exascale GPU- and APU-based systems provide multiple power and energy sensors, but differences in scope, update rate, timing, and filtering complicate the attribution of short-lived accelerator activity. This paper presents a methodology to characterize and correct these effects on Cray EX systems with AMD Instinct MI250X GPUs (Frontier) and MI300A APUs (Portage). Using controlled square-wave workloads, we quantify update intervals, delay, aliasing, and variability across up to 512 GPUs and 480 APUs with on-chip (rocm-smi/amd-smi) and off-chip Cray Power Management sensors. We reconstruct power from cumulative energy counters to achieve faster response times, validate it against on-chip, off-chip, and node-level sensors, and integrate the resulting streams into a Score-P/PAPI-based tool for time-aligned, phase-level attribution. Applied to rocHPL, rocHPL-MxP, and HPG-MxP, the method separates energy savings due to reduced runtime from changes in power. Mixed precision reduces node energy on Frontier by 79% for rocHPL-MxP and 31% for HPG-MxP, with similar trends on Portage. These results provide portable guidance for sensor validation and power-aware optimization on current and future exascale systems.
@article{arxiv.2604.06056,
title = {Fine-Grained Power and Energy Attribution on AMD GPU/APU-Based Exascale Nodes},
author = {Adam McDaniel and Michael Jantz and Ashesh Sharma and Steve Abbott and Steven Martin and Shreyas Khandekar and Brandon Neth and Bruno Villasenor Alvarez and Aditya Kashi and Wael Elwasif and Oscar Hernandez},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.06056},
year = {2026}
}