English

Faster Newton Methods for Convex and Nonconvex Optimization in Gradient Complexity

Optimization and Control 2026-01-26 v2

Abstract

Second-order optimization methods are computationally expensive for large-scale problems. Recently, Doikov, Chayti, and Jaggi (ICML 2023) proposed the LazyCRN method that reduces computation by studying the gradient complexity of second-order methods. Their method can achieve a gradient complexity of O(d+d1/2ϵ3/2)\mathcal{O}( d + d^{1/2} \epsilon^{-3/2}) and O(d+d1/2ϵ1/2)\mathcal{O}( d + d^{1/2} \epsilon^{-1/2}) for nonconvex and convex optimization, respectively, where dd is the effective dimension and ϵ\epsilon is the target precision. Very recently, Adil, Bullins, Sidford, and Zhang (NeurIPS 2025) improved the gradient complexity to O(d+d1/3ϵ3/2ln18ϵ1)\mathcal{O}( d + d^{1/3} \epsilon^{-3/2} \ln^{18} \epsilon^{-1}) for nonconvex optimization. However, the tightness of these methods remains open. In this work, we propose new methods that achieve an improved complexity of O(d+d1/3ϵ3/2)\mathcal{O}( d + d^{1/3} \epsilon^{-3/2}) and O((d+d13/21ϵ2/7)lnd)\mathcal{O}( (d + d^{13/21} \epsilon^{-2/7}) \ln d) for nonconvex and convex optimization, respectively, improving best-known results for both setups.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2501.17488,
  title  = {Faster Newton Methods for Convex and Nonconvex Optimization in Gradient Complexity},
  author = {Lesi Chen and Chengchang Liu and Luo Luo and Jingzhao Zhang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.17488},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Add new results for nonconvex optimization compared with v1

R2 v1 2026-06-28T21:23:24.660Z