Fast generation of mock galaxy catalogues with COLA
Abstract
We investigate the feasibility of using COmoving Lagrangian Acceleration (COLA) technique to efficiently generate galaxy mock catalogues that can accurately reproduce the statistical properties of observed galaxies. Our proposed scheme combines the subhalo abundance matching (SHAM) procedure with COLA simulations, utilizing only three free parameters: the scatter magnitude () in SHAM, the initial redshift () of the COLA simulation, and the time stride () used by COLA. In this proof-of-concept study, we focus on a subset of BOSS CMASS NGC galaxies within the redshift range . We perform simulation and low-resolution COLA simulations with various combinations of , each using particles in an box. By minimizing the difference between COLA mock and CMASS NGC galaxies for the monopole of the two-point correlation function (2PCF), we obtain the optimal . We have found that by setting and , we achieve a good agreement between COLA mock and CMASS NGC galaxies within the range of 4 to , with a computational cost two orders of magnitude lower than that of the N-body code. Moreover, a detailed verification is performed by comparing various statistical properties, such as anisotropic 2PCF, three-point clustering, and power spectrum multipoles, which shows similar performance between GADGET mock and COLA mock catalogues with the CMASS NGC galaxies. Furthermore, we assess the robustness of the COLA mock catalogues across different cosmological models, demonstrating consistent results in the resulting 2PCFs. Our findings suggest that COLA simulations are a promising tool for efficiently generating mock catalogues for emulators and machine learning analyses in exploring the large-scale structure of the Universe.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2311.00981,
title = {Fast generation of mock galaxy catalogues with COLA},
author = {Jiacheng Ding and Shaohong Li and Yi Zheng and Xiaolin Luo and Le Zhang and Xiao-Dong Li},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.00981},
year = {2024}
}
Comments
24 pages, 14 figures, 4 tables