English

Factorization in monoids and rings

Rings and Algebras 2020-05-05 v1 Commutative Algebra

Abstract

Let H×H^\times be the group of units of a multiplicatively written monoid HH. We say HH is acyclic if xyzyxyz \ne y for all x,y,zHx, y, z \in H with xH×x \notin H^\times or zH×z \notin H^\times; unit-cancellative if yxxxyyx \ne x \ne xy for all x,yHx, y \in H with yH×y \notin H^\times; f.g.u. if there is a finite set AHA \subseteq H such that every non-unit of HH is a finite product of elements of the form uavuav with u,vH×u, v \in H^\times and aAa \in A; l.f.g.u. if, for each xHx \in H, the smallest divisor-closed submonoid of HH containing xx is f.g.u; and atomic if every non-unit can be written as a finite product of atoms, where an atom is a non-unit that does not factor into a product of two non-units. We generalize to l.f.g.u. or acyclic l.f.g.u. monoids a few results so far only known for unit-cancellative l.f.g.u. commutative monoids (cancellative monoids are unit-cancellative, and a commutative monoid is unit-cancellative if and only if it is acyclic). In particular, we prove the following: \bullet If HH is an atomic l.f.g.u. monoid, then every non-unit has only finitely many factorizations (into atoms) that are "minimal" and "pairwise non-equivalent" (with respect to some naturally defined relations on the free monoid over the "alphabet" of atoms). \bullet If HH is an acyclic l.f.g.u. monoid, then it is atomic; and moreover, each element has only finitely many "pairwise non-equivalent" factorizations if we additionally assume HH to be commutative.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2005.01681,
  title  = {Factorization in monoids and rings},
  author = {Salvatore Tringali},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01681},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

24 pp.; no figures. Comments are very welcome

R2 v1 2026-06-23T15:18:05.054Z