English

Facility Location Problem under Local Differential Privacy without Super-set Assumption

Cryptography and Security 2025-06-19 v1

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce an adaptation of the facility location problem and analyze it within the framework of local differential privacy (LDP). Under this model, we ensure the privacy of client presence at specific locations. When n is the number of points, Gupta et al. established a lower bound of Ω(n)\Omega(\sqrt{n}) on the approximation ratio for any differentially private algorithm applied to the original facility location problem. As a result, subsequent works have adopted the super-set assumption, which may, however, compromise user privacy. We show that this lower bound does not apply to our adaptation by presenting an LDP algorithm that achieves a constant approximation ratio with a relatively small additive factor. Additionally, we provide experimental results demonstrating that our algorithm outperforms the straightforward approach on both synthetically generated and real-world datasets.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2506.15224,
  title  = {Facility Location Problem under Local Differential Privacy without Super-set Assumption},
  author = {Kevin Pfisterer and Quentin Hillebrand and Vorapong Suppakitpaisarn},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.15224},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

accepted at DBSec 2025

R2 v1 2026-07-01T03:23:12.847Z