English

Facilitating Holistic Evaluations with LLMs: Insights from Scenario-Based Experiments

Computers and Society 2025-07-04 v2 Artificial Intelligence Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Workshop courses designed to foster creativity are gaining popularity. However, even experienced faculty teams find it challenging to realize a holistic evaluation that accommodates diverse perspectives. Adequate deliberation is essential to integrate varied assessments, but faculty often lack the time for such exchanges. Deriving an average score without discussion undermines the purpose of a holistic evaluation. Therefore, this paper explores the use of a Large Language Model (LLM) as a facilitator to integrate diverse faculty assessments. Scenario-based experiments were conducted to determine if the LLM could integrate diverse evaluations and explain the underlying pedagogical theories to faculty. The results were noteworthy, showing that the LLM can effectively facilitate faculty discussions. Additionally, the LLM demonstrated the capability to create evaluation criteria by generalizing a single scenario-based experiment, leveraging its already acquired pedagogical domain knowledge.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2405.17728,
  title  = {Facilitating Holistic Evaluations with LLMs: Insights from Scenario-Based Experiments},
  author = {Toru Ishida and Tongxi Liu and Hailong Wang and William K. Cheunga},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17728},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

The final version appears in the proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Computers in Education (ICCE 2024)

R2 v1 2026-06-28T16:43:04.214Z