Extracting a less model dependent cosmic ray composition from $X_\mathrm{max}$ distributions
Abstract
At higher energies the uncertainty in the estimated cosmic ray mass composition, extracted from the observed distributions of the depth of shower maximum , is dominated by uncertainties in the hadronic interaction models. Thus, the estimated composition depends strongly on the particular model used for its interpretation. To reduce this model dependency in the interpretation of the mass composition, we have developed a novel approach which allows the adjustment of the normalisation levels of the proton and guided by real observations of distributions. In this paper we describe the details of this approach and present a study of its performance and its limitations. Using this approach we extracted cosmic ray mass composition information from the published Pierre Auger distributions. We have obtained a consistent mass composition interpretation for Epos-LHC, QGSJetII-04 and Sibyll2.3. Our fits suggest a composition consisting of predominantly iron. Below eV, the small proportions of proton, helium and nitrogen vary. Above eV, there is little proton or helium, and with increasing energy the nitrogen component gradually gives way to the growing iron component, which dominates at the highest energies. The fits suggest that the normalisation level for proton is much deeper than the initial predictions of the hadronic interaction models. The fitted normalisation level for proton is also greater than the model predictions. When fixing the expected normalisation of to that suggested by the QGSJetII-04 model, a slightly larger fraction of protons is obtained. These results remain sensitive to the other model parameters that we keep fixed, such as the elongation rate and the separation between p and Fe.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1803.02520,
title = {Extracting a less model dependent cosmic ray composition from $X_\mathrm{max}$ distributions},
author = {Simon Blaess and Jose A. Bellido and Bruce R. Dawson},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02520},
year = {2018}
}
Comments
31 ages, 61 figures