English

Evolutionary Trees and the Ising Model on the Bethe Lattice: a Proof of Steel's Conjecture

Probability 2011-09-30 v3 Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science Data Structures and Algorithms Classical Analysis and ODEs Combinatorics Statistics Theory Populations and Evolution Statistics Theory

Abstract

A major task of evolutionary biology is the reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from molecular data. The evolutionary model is given by a Markov chain on a tree. Given samples from the leaves of the Markov chain, the goal is to reconstruct the leaf-labelled tree. It is well known that in order to reconstruct a tree on nn leaves, sample sequences of length Ω(logn)\Omega(\log n) are needed. It was conjectured by M. Steel that for the CFN/Ising evolutionary model, if the mutation probability on all edges of the tree is less than p=(21)/23/2p^{\ast} = (\sqrt{2}-1)/2^{3/2}, then the tree can be recovered from sequences of length O(logn)O(\log n). The value pp^{\ast} is given by the transition point for the extremality of the free Gibbs measure for the Ising model on the binary tree. Steel's conjecture was proven by the second author in the special case where the tree is "balanced." The second author also proved that if all edges have mutation probability larger than pp^{\ast} then the length needed is nΩ(1)n^{\Omega(1)}. Here we show that Steel's conjecture holds true for general trees by giving a reconstruction algorithm that recovers the tree from O(logn)O(\log n)-length sequences when the mutation probabilities are discretized and less than pp^\ast. Our proof and results demonstrate that extremality of the free Gibbs measure on the infinite binary tree, which has been studied before in probability, statistical physics and computer science, determines how distinguishable are Gibbs measures on finite binary trees.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0509575,
  title  = {Evolutionary Trees and the Ising Model on the Bethe Lattice: a Proof of Steel's Conjecture},
  author = {Constantinos Daskalakis and Elchanan Mossel and Sebastien Roch},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0509575},
  year   = {2011}
}

Comments

Second major revision. Updated proofs and statements