English

Evidence of the pair instability gap from black hole masses

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2026-05-12 v2

Abstract

Stellar theory predicts a forbidden range of black-hole masses between 50{\sim}50--130M130\,M_\odot due to pair-instability supernovae, but evidence for such a gap in the mass distribution from gravitational-wave astronomy has proved elusive. Early hints of a cutoff in black-hole masses at 45M{\sim} 45\,M_\odot disappeared with the subsequent discovery of more massive binary black holes. Here, we report evidence of the pair-instability gap in LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA's fourth gravitational wave transient catalog (GWTC-4), with a lower boundary of 444+5M44_{-4}^{+5} M_\odot (90\% credibility). While the gap is not present in the distribution of \textit{primary} masses m1m_1 (the bigger of the two black holes in a binary system), it appears unambiguously in the distribution of \textit{secondary} masses m2m_2, where m2m1m_2 \leq m_1. The location of the gap lines up well with a previously identified transition in the binary black-hole spin distribution; binaries with primary components in the gap tend to spin more rapidly than those below the gap. We interpret these findings as evidence for a subpopulation of hierarchical mergers: binaries where the primary component is the product of a previous black-hole merger and thus populates the gap. Our measurement of the location of the pair-instability gap constrains the SS-factor for 12C(α,γ)16O^{12}\rm{C}(\alpha,\gamma)^{16}\rm{O} at 300keV to 260108+190260_{-108}^{+190} keV barns.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2509.04151,
  title  = {Evidence of the pair instability gap from black hole masses},
  author = {Hui Tong and Maya Fishbach and Eric Thrane and Matthew Mould and Thomas A. Callister and Amanda Farah and Nir Guttman and Sharan Banagiri and Daniel Beltran-Martinez and Ben Farr and Shanika Galaudage and Jaxen Godfrey and Jack Heinzel and Marios Kalomenopoulos and Simona J. Miller and Aditya Vijaykumar},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04151},
  year   = {2026}
}

Comments

Nature (2026)