Euclid: constraining dark energy coupled to electromagnetism using astrophysical and laboratory data
Abstract
In physically realistic scalar-field based dynamical dark energy models (including, e.g., quintessence) one naturally expects the scalar field to couple to the rest of the model's degrees of freedom. In particular, a coupling to the electromagnetic sector leads to a time (redshift) dependence of the fine-structure constant and a violation of the Weak Equivalence Principle. Here we extend the previous Euclid forecast constraints on dark energy models to this enlarged (but physically more realistic) parameter space, and forecast how well Euclid, together with high-resolution spectroscopic data and local experiments, can constrain these models. Our analysis combines simulated Euclid data products with astrophysical measurements of the fine-structure constant, , and local experimental constraints, and includes both parametric and non-parametric methods. For the astrophysical measurements of we consider both the currently available data and a simulated dataset representative of Extremely Large Telescope measurements and expected to be available in the 2030s. Our parametric analysis shows that in the latter case the inclusion of astrophysical and local data improves the Euclid dark energy figure of merit by between and , depending on the correct fiducial model, with the improvements being larger in the null case where the fiducial coupling to the electromagnetic sector is vanishing. These improvements would be smaller with the current astrophysical data. Moreover, we illustrate how a genetic algorithms based reconstruction provides a null test for the presence of the coupling. Our results highlight the importance of complementing surveys like Euclid with external data products, in order to accurately test the wider parameter spaces of physically motivated paradigms.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2105.09746,
title = {Euclid: constraining dark energy coupled to electromagnetism using astrophysical and laboratory data},
author = {M. Martinelli and C. J. A. P. Martins and S. Nesseris and I. Tutusaus and A. Blanchard and S. Camera and C. Carbone and S. Casas and V. Pettorino and Z. Sakr and V. Yankelevich and D. Sapone and A. Amara and N. Auricchio and C. Bodendorf and D. Bonino and E. Branchini and V. Capobianco and J. Carretero and M. Castellano and S. Cavuoti and A. Cimatti and R. Cledassou and L. Corcione and A. Costille and H. Degaudenzi and M. Douspis and F. Dubath and S. Dusini and A. Ealet and S. Ferriol and M. Frailis and E. Franceschi and B. Garilli and C. Giocoli and A. Grazian and F. Grupp and S. V. H. Haugan and W. Holmes and F. Hormuth and K. Jahnke and A. Kiessling and M. Kümmel and M. Kunz and H. Kurki-Suonio and S. Ligori and P. B. Lilje and I. Lloro and O. Mansutti and O. Marggraf and K. Markovic and R. Massey and M. Meneghetti and G. Meylan and L. Moscardini and S. M. Niemi and C. Padilla and S. Paltani and F. Pasian and K. Pedersen and S. Pires and M. Poncet and L. Popa and F. Raison and R. Rebolo and J. Rhodes and M. Roncarelli and E. Rossetti and R. Saglia and A. Secroun and G. Seidel and S. Serrano and C. Sirignano and G. Sirri and J. -L. Starck and D. Tavagnacco and A. N. Taylor and I. Tereno and R. Toledo-Moreo and L. Valenziano and Y. Wang and G. Zamorani and J. Zoubian and M. Baldi and M. Brescia and G. Congedo and L. Conversi and Y. Copin and G. Fabbian and R. Farinelli and E. Medinaceli and S. Mei and G. Polenta and E. Romelli and T. Vassallo},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.09746},
year = {2021}
}
Comments
14 pages, 7 figures. Submitted to Astronomy & Astrophysics