English

Ethical Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence 2015-11-18 v9

Abstract

This book-length article combines several peer reviewed papers and new material to analyze the issues of ethical artificial intelligence (AI). The behavior of future AI systems can be described by mathematical equations, which are adapted to analyze possible unintended AI behaviors and ways that AI designs can avoid them. This article makes the case for utility-maximizing agents and for avoiding infinite sets in agent definitions. It shows how to avoid agent self-delusion using model-based utility functions and how to avoid agents that corrupt their reward generators (sometimes called "perverse instantiation") using utility functions that evaluate outcomes at one point in time from the perspective of humans at a different point in time. It argues that agents can avoid unintended instrumental actions (sometimes called "basic AI drives" or "instrumental goals") by accurately learning human values. This article defines a self-modeling agent framework and shows how it can avoid problems of resource limits, being predicted by other agents, and inconsistency between the agent's utility function and its definition (one version of this problem is sometimes called "motivated value selection"). This article also discusses how future AI will differ from current AI, the politics of AI, and the ultimate use of AI to help understand the nature of the universe and our place in it.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1411.1373,
  title  = {Ethical Artificial Intelligence},
  author = {Bill Hibbard},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.1373},
  year   = {2015}
}

Comments

minor edit: remove page break between Figure 10.2 and its caption

R2 v1 2026-06-22T06:49:20.682Z