English

Etherington duality breaking: gravitational lensing in non-metric spacetimes versus intrinsic alignments

Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics 2022-12-07 v2

Abstract

The Etherington distance duality relation is well-established for metric theories of gravity, and confirms the duality between the luminosity distance and the angular diameter distance through the conservation of surface brightness. A violation of the Etherington distance duality due to lensing in a non-metric spacetime would lead to fluctuations in surface brightness of galaxies. Likewise, fluctuations of the surface brightness can arise in classical astrophysics as a consequence of intrinsic tidal interaction of galaxies with their environment. Therefore, we study these in two cases in detail: Firstly, for intrinsic size fluctuations and the resulting changes in surface brightness, and secondly, for an area-metric spacetime as an example of a non-metric spacetime where the distance duality relation itself acquires modifications. The aim of this work is to quantify whether a surface brightness fluctuation effect due to area-metric gravity would be resolvable compared to the similar effect caused by intrinsic alignment. We thus compare the auto- and cross-correlations of the angular spectra in these two cases and show that the fluctuations in intrinsic brightness can potentially be measured with a cumulative signal-to-noise ratio Σ()3\Sigma(\ell) \geq 3 in a Euclid-like survey. The measurement in area-metric spacetimes, however, depends on the specific parameter choices, which also determine the shape and amplitude of the spectra. While lensing surveys do have sensitivity to lensing-induced surface brightness fluctuations in area-metric spacetimes, the measurement does not seem to be possible for natural values of the Etherington-breaking parameters.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2208.07197,
  title  = {Etherington duality breaking: gravitational lensing in non-metric spacetimes versus intrinsic alignments},
  author = {Eileen Sophie Giesel and Basundhara Ghosh and Björn Malte Schäfer},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.07197},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

12 pages, 6 figures, submitted to MNRAS