English

Epidemic models with digital and manual contact tracing

Probability 2026-01-14 v3 Populations and Evolution

Abstract

We analyze a Markovian SIR epidemic model where individuals either recover naturally or are diagnosed, leading to isolation and potential contact tracing. Our focus is on digital contact tracing via a tracing app, considering both its standalone use and combination with manual tracing. We prove that as the population size nn grows large, the epidemic process converges to a limiting process, which, unlike typical epidemic models, is not a branching process due to dependencies created by contact tracing. However, by grouping to-be-traced individuals into macro-individuals, we derive a multi-type branching process interpretation, allowing computation of the reproduction number RR. This is then converted to an individual reproduction number R(ind)R^{(ind)}, which, contrary to RR, decays monotonically with the fraction of app-users while both share the same threshold at 1. Finally, we compare digital (only) contact tracing and manual (only) contact tracing, proving that the critical fraction app-users πc\pi_c required for R=1R=1 is higher than the critical fraction manually contact traced pcp_c for manual tracing.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2211.12869,
  title  = {Epidemic models with digital and manual contact tracing},
  author = {Tom Britton and Dongni Zhang},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.12869},
  year   = {2026}
}