English

Energy conditions bounds and their confrontation with supernovae data

Astrophysics 2009-06-23 v2 General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology High Energy Physics - Theory

Abstract

The energy conditions play an important role in the understanding of several properties of the Universe, including the current accelerating expansion phase and the possible existence of the so-called phantom fields. We show that the integrated bounds provided by the energy conditions on cosmological observables such as the distance modulus μ(z)\mu(z) and the lookback time tL(z)t_L(z) are not sufficient (nor necessary) to ensure the local fulfillment of the energy conditions, making explicit the limitation of these bounds in the confrontation with observational data. We recast the energy conditions as bounds on the deceleration and normalized Hubble parameters, obtaining new bounds which are necessary and sufficient for the local fulfillment of the energy conditions. A statistical confrontation, with 1σ3σ1\sigma-3\sigma confidence levels, between our bounds and supernovae data from the gold and combined samples is made for the recent past. Our analyses indicate, with 3σ3\sigma confidence levels, the fulfillment of both the weak energy condition (WEC) and dominant energy condition (DEC) for z1z \leq 1 and z0.8z \lesssim 0.8, respectively. In addition, they suggest a possible recent violation of the null energy condition (NEC) with 3σ3\sigma, i.e. a very recent phase of super-acceleration. Our analyses also show the possibility of violation of the strong energy condition (\textbf{SEC}) with 3σ3\sigma in the recent past (z1z \leq 1), but interestingly the q(z)q(z)-best-fit curve crosses the SEC-fulfillment divider at z0.67z \simeq 0.67, which is a value very close to the beginning of the epoch of cosmic acceleration predicted by the standard concordance flat Λ\LambdaCDM scenario.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0802.0706,
  title  = {Energy conditions bounds and their confrontation with supernovae data},
  author = {M. P. Lima and S. Vitenti and M. J. Reboucas},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0802.0706},
  year   = {2009}
}

Comments

7 pages, 3 figures. V2: Version to appear in Phys.Rev.D, analyses extended to 1sigma, 2sigma and 3sigma confidence levels, references added, minors changes

R2 v1 2026-06-21T10:09:52.210Z