English

Energy concentration and Sommerfeld condition for Helmholtz equation with variable index at infinity

Analysis of PDEs 2007-05-23 v1

Abstract

We consider the Helmholtz equation with a variable index of refraction n(x)n(x), which is not necessarily constant at infinity but can have an angular dependency like n(x)n_(x/x)n(x)\to n\_\infty(x/|x |) as x|x |\to \infty. Under some appropriate assumptions on this convergence and on n_n\_\infty we prove that the Sommerfeld condition at infinity still holds true under the explicit form _Rduin_1/2u\xox2\fdxx<+. \int\_{\R^d} | \nabla u -i n\_\infty^{1/2} u \xox |^2 \f{dx}{|x |}<+\infty. It is a very striking and unexpected feature that the index n_n\_{\infty} appears in this formula and not the gradient of the phase as established by Saito in \cite {S} and broadly used numerically. This apparent contradiction is clarified by the existence of some extra estimates on the energy decay. In particular we prove that _Rd_ωn_(\xox)2\fu2xdx<+. \int\_{\R^d} | \nabla\_\omega n\_\infty(\xox)|^2 \f{| u |^2}{|x |} dx < +\infty. In fact our main contribution is to show that this can be interpreted as a concentration of the energy along the critical lines of n_n\_\infty. In other words, the Sommerfeld condition hides the main physical effect arising for a variable nn at infinity; energy concentration on lines rather than dispersion in all directions.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.math/0607801,
  title  = {Energy concentration and Sommerfeld condition for Helmholtz equation with variable index at infinity},
  author = {Benoit Perthame and Luis Vega},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0607801},
  year   = {2007}
}
R2 v1 2026-07-22T17:39:53.128Z