English

Efficiently Testing Sparse GF(2) Polynomials

Computational Complexity 2008-05-14 v1

Abstract

We give the first algorithm that is both query-efficient and time-efficient for testing whether an unknown function f:{0,1}n{0,1}f: \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\} is an ss-sparse GF(2) polynomial versus \eps\eps-far from every such polynomial. Our algorithm makes \poly(s,1/\eps)\poly(s,1/\eps) black-box queries to ff and runs in time n\poly(s,1/\eps)n \cdot \poly(s,1/\eps). The only previous algorithm for this testing problem \cite{DLM+:07} used poly(s,1/\eps)(s,1/\eps) queries, but had running time exponential in ss and super-polynomial in 1/\eps1/\eps. Our approach significantly extends the ``testing by implicit learning'' methodology of \cite{DLM+:07}. The learning component of that earlier work was a brute-force exhaustive search over a concept class to find a hypothesis consistent with a sample of random examples. In this work, the learning component is a sophisticated exact learning algorithm for sparse GF(2) polynomials due to Schapire and Sellie \cite{SchapireSellie:96}. A crucial element of this work, which enables us to simulate the membership queries required by \cite{SchapireSellie:96}, is an analysis establishing new properties of how sparse GF(2) polynomials simplify under certain restrictions of ``low-influence'' sets of variables.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.0805.1765,
  title  = {Efficiently Testing Sparse GF(2) Polynomials},
  author = {Ilias Diakonikolas and Homin K. Lee and Kevin Matulef and Rocco A. Servedio and Andrew Wan},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:0805.1765},
  year   = {2008}
}

Comments

Full version of ICALP 2008 paper

R2 v1 2026-06-21T10:39:45.419Z