The value of Earth observation foundation models for high-impact ecological applications remains insufficiently characterized. This study is one of the first to systematically evaluate the performance, limitations and practical considerations across three common ecological use cases: forest functional trait estimation, land use and land cover mapping and peatland detection. We fine-tune two pretrained models (Prithvi-EO-2.0 and TerraMind) and benchmark them against a ResNet-101 baseline using datasets collected from open sources. Across all tasks, Prithvi-EO-2.0 and TerraMind consistently outperform the ResNet baseline, demonstrating improved generalization and transfer across ecological domains. TerraMind marginally exceeds Prithvi-EO-2.0 in unimodal settings and shows substantial gains when additional modalities are incorporated. However, performance is sensitive to divergence between downstream inputs and pretraining modalities, underscoring the need for careful dataset alignment. Results also indicate that higher-resolution inputs and more accurate pixel-level labels remain critical for capturing fine-scale ecological dynamics.
@article{arxiv.2602.10720,
title = {Ecological mapping with geospatial foundation models},
author = {Craig Mahlasi and Gciniwe S. Baloyi and Zaheed Gaffoor and Levente Klein and Anne Jones and Etienne Vos and Michal Muszynski and Geoffrey Dawson and Campbell Watson},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.10720},
year = {2026}
}