Embodied dialogue instruction following requires an agent to complete a complex sequence of tasks from a natural language exchange. The recent introduction of benchmarks (Padmakumar et al., 2022) raises the question of how best to train and evaluate models for this multi-turn, multi-agent, long-horizon task. This paper contributes to that conversation, by arguing that imitation learning (IL) and related low-level metrics are actually misleading and do not align with the goals of embodied dialogue research and may hinder progress. We provide empirical comparisons of metrics, analysis of three models, and make suggestions for how the field might best progress. First, we observe that models trained with IL take spurious actions during evaluation. Second, we find that existing models fail to ground query utterances, which are essential for task completion. Third, we argue evaluation should focus on higher-level semantic goals.
@article{arxiv.2210.04443,
title = {Don't Copy the Teacher: Data and Model Challenges in Embodied Dialogue},
author = {So Yeon Min and Hao Zhu and Ruslan Salakhutdinov and Yonatan Bisk},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.04443},
year = {2022}
}