English

Domain-Independent Deception: Definition, Taxonomy and the Linguistic Cues Debate

Cryptography and Security 2022-07-06 v1 Computers and Society

Abstract

Internet-based economies and societies are drowning in deceptive attacks. These attacks take many forms, such as fake news, phishing, and job scams, which we call "domains of deception." Machine-learning and natural-language-processing researchers have been attempting to ameliorate this precarious situation by designing domain-specific detectors. Only a few recent works have considered domain-independent deception. We collect these disparate threads of research and investigate domain-independent deception along four dimensions. First, we provide a new computational definition of deception and formalize it using probability theory. Second, we break down deception into a new taxonomy. Third, we analyze the debate on linguistic cues for deception and supply guidelines for systematic reviews. Fourth, we provide some evidence and some suggestions for domain-independent deception detection.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2207.01738,
  title  = {Domain-Independent Deception: Definition, Taxonomy and the Linguistic Cues Debate},
  author = {Rakesh M. Verma and Nachum Dershowitz and Victor Zeng and Xuting Liu},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.01738},
  year   = {2022}
}

Comments

16 pages, 2 figures