English

Does H$\alpha$ Stokes~$V$ profiles probe the chromospheric magnetic field? An observational perspective

Solar and Stellar Astrophysics 2023-04-05 v1

Abstract

We investigated the diagnostic potential of the Stokes VV profile of the Hα\alpha line to probe the chromospheric line-of-sight (LOS) magnetic field (BLOSB_{\mathrm{LOS}}) by comparing the BLOSB_{\mathrm{LOS}} inferred from the weak field approximation (WFA) with that of inferred from the multi-line inversions of the Ca II 8542 {\AA}, Si I 8536 {\AA} and Fe I 8538 {\AA} lines using the STiC inversion code. Simultaneous spectropolarimetric observations of a pore in the Ca II 8542 {\AA} and Hα\alpha spectral lines obtained from the SPINOR at the Dunn Solar Telescope on the 4th of December, 2008 are used in this study. The WFA was applied on the Stokes II and VV profiles of Hα\alpha line over three wavelength ranges viz.: around line core (Δλ=±0.35\Delta\lambda=\pm0.35 {\AA}), line wings (Δλ=[1.5,0.6]\Delta\lambda=[-1.5, -0.6] and [+0.6,+1.5][+0.6, +1.5] {\AA}) and full spectral range of the line (Δλ=±1.5\Delta\lambda=\pm1.5 {\AA}) to derive the BLOSB_{\mathrm{LOS}}. We found the maximum BLOSB_{\mathrm{LOS}} strengths of +800\sim+800 and +600\sim+600 G at logτ500\log\tau_{\mathrm{500}} = -1 and -4.5, respectively in the pore. The morphological map of the BLOSB_{\mathrm{LOS}} inferred from the Hα\alpha line core is similar to the BLOSB_{\mathrm{LOS}} map at logτ500\log\tau_{\mathrm{500}} = -4.5 inferred from multi-line inversions. The BLOSB_{\mathrm{LOS}} map inferred from the Hα\alpha line wings and full spectral range have a similar morphological structure to the BLOSB_{\mathrm{LOS}} map inferred at logτ500\log\tau_{\mathrm{500}} = -1. The BLOSB_{\mathrm{LOS}} estimated from Hα\alpha using WFA is weaker by a factor of 0.53\approx 0.53 than that of inferred from the multi-line inversions.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2302.13118,
  title  = {Does H$\alpha$ Stokes~$V$ profiles probe the chromospheric magnetic field? An observational perspective},
  author = {Harsh Mathur and K. Nagaraju and Jayant Joshi and Jaime de la Cruz Rodríguez},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13118},
  year   = {2023}
}

Comments

Accepted to be published in the ApJ on 25th February, 2023