English

Do You Need Proprioceptive States in Visuomotor Policies?

Robotics 2025-09-25 v2 Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Imitation-learning-based visuomotor policies have been widely used in robot manipulation, where both visual observations and proprioceptive states are typically adopted together for precise control. However, in this study, we find that this common practice makes the policy overly reliant on the proprioceptive state input, which causes overfitting to the training trajectories and results in poor spatial generalization. On the contrary, we propose the State-free Policy, removing the proprioceptive state input and predicting actions only conditioned on visual observations. The State-free Policy is built in the relative end-effector action space, and should ensure the full task-relevant visual observations, here provided by dual wide-angle wrist cameras. Empirical results demonstrate that the State-free policy achieves significantly stronger spatial generalization than the state-based policy: in real-world tasks such as pick-and-place, challenging shirt-folding, and complex whole-body manipulation, spanning multiple robot embodiments, the average success rate improves from 0% to 85% in height generalization and from 6% to 64% in horizontal generalization. Furthermore, they also show advantages in data efficiency and cross-embodiment adaptation, enhancing their practicality for real-world deployment. Discover more by visiting: https://statefreepolicy.github.io.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2509.18644,
  title  = {Do You Need Proprioceptive States in Visuomotor Policies?},
  author = {Juntu Zhao and Wenbo Lu and Di Zhang and Yufeng Liu and Yushen Liang and Tianluo Zhang and Yifeng Cao and Junyuan Xie and Yingdong Hu and Shengjie Wang and Junliang Guo and Dequan Wang and Yang Gao},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.18644},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

Project page: https://statefreepolicy.github.io