English

Do We Really Need Scene-specific Pose Encoders?

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2020-12-23 v1 Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

Visual pose regression models estimate the camera pose from a query image with a single forward pass. Current models learn pose encoding from an image using deep convolutional networks which are trained per scene. The resulting encoding is typically passed to a multi-layer perceptron in order to regress the pose. In this work, we propose that scene-specific pose encoders are not required for pose regression and that encodings trained for visual similarity can be used instead. In order to test our hypothesis, we take a shallow architecture of several fully connected layers and train it with pre-computed encodings from a generic image retrieval model. We find that these encodings are not only sufficient to regress the camera pose, but that, when provided to a branching fully connected architecture, a trained model can achieve competitive results and even surpass current \textit{state-of-the-art} pose regressors in some cases. Moreover, we show that for outdoor localization, the proposed architecture is the only pose regressor, to date, consistently localizing in under 2 meters and 5 degrees.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2012.12014,
  title  = {Do We Really Need Scene-specific Pose Encoders?},
  author = {Yoli Shavit and Ron Ferens},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.12014},
  year   = {2020}
}

Comments

To be presented at ICPR2020

R2 v1 2026-06-23T21:12:26.407Z