English

Do both black holes spin in merging binaries? Evidence from GWTC-4 and astrophysical implications

High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena 2025-12-02 v1

Abstract

Angular momentum transport in high-mass stars is commonly modeled by extrapolating the behavior of better-observed low-mass stars. According to the conventional picture, the cores of most black hole progenitors lose almost all of their angular momentum when their outer layers are ejected before core collapse. Accordingly, most black holes are expected to be born with dimensionless spin magnitudes of χ0.01\chi \lesssim 0.01, even if some black holes are born with non-negligible spin due to tidal interactions in a progenitor binary. One might therefore expect to find a large fraction of χ0.01\chi \lesssim 0.01 black holes in merging binary black hole (BBH) systems. We find that the conventional picture of angular momentum transport is in tension with data from LIGO--Virgo--KAGRA's fourth gravitational-wave transient catalog. We find no support for a sub-population of BBH systems with χ0.01\chi \lesssim 0.01. Neither do we find support for a sub-population with only one spinning black hole as expected for tidal spin-up scenarios. Instead, we find evidence for two subpopulations in which both black holes have non-negligible spin. Approximately 84% of BBH systems contain two black holes with modest spins χ0.1\chi \approx 0.1 and approximately 16% contain two black holes with large spins χ0.8\chi \approx 0.8. These estimates come from our best-fit model, which is favored with natural log Bayes factors lnB3\ln B \gtrsim 3 over models that require a sub-population of χ0.01\chi \lesssim 0.01 black holes, and models that do not contain multiple spin sub-populations. These results are difficult to reconcile with our current understanding of angular momentum transport.

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.2509.04706,
  title  = {Do both black holes spin in merging binaries? Evidence from GWTC-4 and astrophysical implications},
  author = {Christian Adamcewicz and Nir Guttman and Paul D. Lasky and Eric Thrane},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.04706},
  year   = {2025}
}

Comments

20 pages, 10 figures