Distinguishing between MSSM and NMSSM through $\Delta F=2$ processes
Abstract
We study deviations between MSSM and -invariant NMSSM, with respect to their predictions in processes. We find that potentially significant effects arise either from the well known double-penguin diagrams, due to the extra scalar NMSSM states, or from neutralino-gluino box contributions, due to the extended neutralino sector. Both are discussed to be effective in the large regime. Enhanced genuine-NMSSM contributions in double penguins are expected for a light singlet spectrum (CP-even,CP-odd), while the magnitude of box effects is primarily controlled through singlino mixing. The latter is found to be typically subleading (but non-negligible) for , however it can become dominant for . We also study the low regime, where a distinction between MSSM and NMSSM can come instead due to experimental constraints, acting differently on the allowed parameter space of each model. To this end, we incorporate the LHC Run-I limits from , and non-observation along with Higgs observables and set (different) upper bounds for new physics contributions in processes. We find that a contribution in is still possible for MFV models, however such a large effect is nowadays severely constrained for the case of MSSM, due to stronger bounds on the charged Higgs masses.
Cite
@article{arxiv.1608.08794,
title = {Distinguishing between MSSM and NMSSM through $\Delta F=2$ processes},
author = {Jacky Kumar and Michael Paraskevas},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.08794},
year = {2017}
}
Comments
30 pp. text, 13 pp. appendix. Phrase "Recent limits" replaced by the more appropriate "LHC Run-I limits" due to new data becoming available from ATLAS, CMS. Note added with a brief discussion on these preliminary results. Refs added