Distilling Photon-Counting CT into Routine Chest CT through Clinically Validated Degradation Modeling
Abstract
Photon-counting CT (PCCT) provides superior image quality with higher spatial resolution and lower noise compared to conventional energy-integrating CT (EICT), but its limited clinical availability restricts large-scale research and clinical deployment. To bridge this gap, we propose SUMI, a simulated degradation-to-enhancement method that learns to reverse realistic acquisition artifacts in low-quality EICT by leveraging high-quality PCCT as reference. Our central insight is to explicitly model realistic acquisition degradations, transforming PCCT into clinically plausible lower-quality counterparts and learning to invert this process. The simulated degradations were validated for clinical realism by board-certified radiologists, enabling faithful supervision without requiring paired acquisitions at scale. As outcomes of this technical contribution, we: (1) train a latent diffusion model on 1,046 PCCTs, using an autoencoder first pre-trained on both these PCCTs and 405,379 EICTs from 145 hospitals to extract general CT latent features that we release for reuse in other generative medical imaging tasks; (2) construct a large-scale dataset of over 17,316 publicly available EICTs enhanced to PCCT-like quality, with radiologist-validated voxel-wise annotations of airway trees, arteries, veins, lungs, and lobes; and (3) demonstrate substantial improvements: across external data, SUMI outperforms state-of-the-art image translation methods by 15% in SSIM and 20% in PSNR, improves radiologist-rated clinical utility in reader studies, and enhances downstream top-ranking lesion detection performance, increasing sensitivity by up to 15% and F1 score by up to 10%. Our results suggest that emerging imaging advances can be systematically distilled into routine EICT using limited high-quality scans as reference.
Keywords
Cite
@article{arxiv.2604.07329,
title = {Distilling Photon-Counting CT into Routine Chest CT through Clinically Validated Degradation Modeling},
author = {Junqi Liu and Xinze Zhou and Wenxuan Li and Scott Ye and Arkadiusz Sitek and Xiaofeng Yang and Yucheng Tang and Daguang Xu and Kai Ding and Kang Wang and Yang Yang and Alan L. Yuille and Zongwei Zhou},
journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.07329},
year = {2026}
}