English

Displacements

Category Theory 2014-07-10 v1 Algebraic Geometry Algebraic Topology

Abstract

Given a functor p:EBp:E \rightarrow B and an object eEe \in E , we define a \emph{displacement} of ee along a morphism ε:p(e)b\varepsilon: p(e) \rightarrow b, as a map eε(e)e \rightarrow \nabla_\varepsilon(e) satisfying a universal property analogue to that of a \emph{cocartesian lifting} (pushforward) \emph{\`a la} B\'enabou-Grothendieck-Street. There are many difficulties in geometry that come from the fact that forgetful functors such as p:Var(C)Topp: Var(\mathbf{C}) \rightarrow Top don't have displacements of objects along arbitrary maps. And this can be already seen abstractly, since the existence of a left adjoint to pp, can be reduced to the existence of all displacements of the initial object. However some \emph{schematization functors} exist as approximations. In a broader context, if BB is a model category and pp is a right adjoint, then the right-induced model category on EE exists if and only if all displacements along any trivial cofibration ε\varepsilon, are weak pp-equivalences. In these notes we provide some categorical lemmas that will be necessary for future applications. The idea is to have a \emph{homotopy descent process} for \emph{elementary displacements} when pp has a \emph{presentation} as a 22-pullback of a family {pi:EiB}iJ\{p_i: E_i \rightarrow B\}_{i\in J}. When suitably applied it should lead to techniques similar to Mumford's GIT through homotopy theory (simplicial presheaves).

Keywords

Cite

@article{arxiv.1407.2486,
  title  = {Displacements},
  author = {Hugo V. Bacard},
  journal= {arXiv preprint arXiv:1407.2486},
  year   = {2014}
}

Comments

14 pages

R2 v1 2026-06-22T04:59:35.161Z